Skip to content

What we do

Governance & Compliance

Cloud Adoption Framework governance made operational, with evidence that survives an audit.

  • CAF: Govern, Secure
  • WAF: Security, Operational Excellence

The problem

Governance usually exists as a document rather than a control. The gap only becomes visible when an auditor asks you to evidence that the control has been operating, not that it was designed. That question arrives on a date somebody else sets.

You probably need this if

  • Your governance model is a document, and the estate has moved on since it was written
  • Producing audit evidence means a fortnight of screenshots and chasing people
  • You report against NCSC Cloud Security Principles or DSPT and assemble it by hand each time
  • Control ownership is recorded against teams rather than named people

Recognise more than one of those? A CAF readiness assessment gives you a baseline in three to four weeks, before you commit to anything longer.

What the service covers

  • CAF governance disciplines applied as deployed policy: cost, security baseline, resource consistency, identity, deployment acceleration
  • Regulatory mapping to the frameworks you actually report against: NCSC Cloud Security Principles, Cyber Essentials Plus, ISO 27001, DSPT where applicable
  • Azure Policy compliance reporting with evidence export, so audit responses are a query rather than a fortnight of screenshots
  • Landing zone conformance review against the Azure landing zone design areas
  • Change advisory input for platform-affecting changes
  • Documented control ownership: a RACI that names people, not teams

When did you last evidence a control rather than describe it?

Those are different answers, and only one of them survives an audit. Book a call and we will work out which controls you could evidence tomorrow.