Industries
Financial services
Work with a European banking group and a global enterprise under NDA. Regulated environments where the control has to be evidenced, not just designed.
What is different here
Design is assessed on whether it can be evidenced
In a regulated institution, a control that works but cannot be demonstrated to have been working is treated as a control that does not exist. That single fact should shape the platform design, and it usually does not.
We build for the examination up front: policy assignment that produces an audit trail, exemptions that expire, privileged access that is reviewed on a schedule and can be shown to have been reviewed.
Operational resilience
Recovery objectives tested rather than documented. We verify restores instead of reporting that backups completed.
Privileged access
PIM for standing privilege, access reviews on a fixed cadence, and a record of who approved what.
Third-party and concentration risk
Clear documentation of the shared responsibility split, including ours, for your outsourcing register.
Change control
Infrastructure as code with policy gates in the pipeline, so the change record is a by-product of the change rather than a separate exercise.
Facing an examination or an internal audit?
The gap is usually evidence rather than control design. That is a shorter piece of work than most people expect.